top of page
Search

To Ban or Not to Ban, that is the question. The Great Social Media Dilemma

Today the UK Government announced its plans to strengthen restrictions on social media use for children and young people under the age of 16. The proposal has sparked intense debate among parents, teachers, politicians, technology companies and of course, young people themselves. Supporters argue that social media is exposing children to harmful content, damaging mental health, and increasing the risk of exploitation. Critics believe that a ban may be difficult to enforce and could limit access to valuable social connections and educational opportunities.


Teenagers using smart phones
Teenagers using smart phones

Public support for the proposed ban has been remarkably strong among parents. According to the Government's consultation, around 90% of parents backed the restrictions on social media for children under 16, reflecting the growing widespread concerns about online safety, mental health implications, the ease of exposure to harmful content, and the addictive nature of many social media platforms. This level of support suggests that many parents feel existing safeguards have not gone far enough to protect children online.

Let’s also remember this is not a new concern – since social media and online platforms became readily accessible there have been examples of the toxic impact it has had. From Molly Russel to Breck Bednar, children’s lives have been cut short.

The case of Breck Bednar is one of the most tragic examples of the dangers that can exist within online communities. 12 years ago in 2014, Breck, a 14-year-old boy from Essex, was groomed by an adult he met through online gaming and communication platforms. The offender spent months building trust with Breck, isolating him from family and friends before ultimately luring him to his home, where he was murdered. The case highlighted how online media can be used by predators to manipulate young people. Gaming platforms, chat rooms, and social media can create opportunities for strangers to develop relationships with children without parents fully understanding the risks. Breck's story demonstrated that online dangers are not limited to harmful content but can also involve real-world threats resulting from online interactions. Since his death, his mum has campaigned tirelessly to ensure awareness campaigns are in places and educational programmes have used Breck's story to teach young people about online grooming, digital safety, and the importance of recognising warning signs when interacting with strangers online. The Breck Foundation was set up to honour his memory and help young people safely reclaim use of the internet. https://www.breckfoundation.org/  His case remains a powerful reminder of why online safeguarding measures and digital literacy education are essential for protecting children in an increasingly connected world.



This ongoing discussion also raises important questions about how society can protect young people online while allowing them to benefit from the opportunities that the digital world offers.


Why Is the Government Taking Action?

Concerns about social media have been growing for more than a decade. Researchers have linked excessive social media use to increased levels of anxiety, depression, sleep disruption, cyberbullying, poor body image, and exposure to harmful content. There are also concerns about the addictive nature of many platforms, which are designed to keep users engaged for as long as possible. Over the last decade the growth of social media has been extraordinary. In 2014, there were approximately 2 billion social media users worldwide. By 2024, that figure had risen to more than 5 billion users, representing an increase of around 150% in just ten years. Today, over 62% of the world's population uses at least one social media platform.

Another influential case in this debate is that of Molly Russell. In 2017, the 14-year-old took her own life after viewing large amounts of self-harm and suicide-related content online. During the subsequent inquest, the coroner concluded that Molly had been exposed to material that was not safe for a child and that the content had contributed to her death. Her case became a landmark moment in discussions about online safety and the responsibility of social media companies. The Molly Rose Foundation https://mollyrosefoundation.org/ was works tirelessly to support children and families as well as backing research and campaigns such as the ‘Growing up online consultation’ and the documentary Molly and the Machine which looks at how social media platforms have put profit before safety at times exposing children to harmful online content.

Law enforcement agencies have repeatedly warned that the online environment can expose children to risks that many parents do not fully understand. As a result, there have been growing calls for stronger regulation and greater protection for young users.



Although no final list has been confirmed, any restrictions would likely affect the platforms most commonly used by teenagers, including TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), Discord, and Reddit.

Let’s first consider the impact it would have if (or when) this social media ban is effectively enforced.  This could include the significant effects on the type of content produced, audience engagement, and overall viewing figures across platforms. Teenagers make up a substantial proportion of users on platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, and YouTube. Removing or restricting access for under-16s would likely lead to:

  • A reduction in total daily active users.

  • Lower overall viewing figures, particularly for content aimed at younger audiences.

  • Reduced engagement through likes, shares, comments, and trends.

  • Lower advertising revenue from brands targeting teenagers.

Many influencers and content creators rely heavily on teenage audiences. Content categories such as gaming, fashion, beauty, challenges, lifestyle, and entertainment could see noticeable declines in engagement.

It would likely also lead to content creators needing to adapt their content to   target an older audiences. This could result in:

  • More content aimed at young adults rather than teenagers.

  • Fewer trends driven by school-age users.

  • Less emphasis on viral challenges and youth culture.

  • Greater focus on news, finance, careers, parenting, and adult interests.

We know that teenagers play a major role in shaping internet culture. Many viral dances, memes, slang terms, and online trends originate from younger users, many of who are pre-teens. Restricting their participation could change the culture of social media platforms significantly.

Like everything, there are two sides to each coin, lets now look at the positive and address the pitfalls of social media. While much of the debate focuses on the risks of social media, there are also several potential benefits for under-16s when platforms are used safely and in moderation.

While much of the discussion surrounding social media focuses on its risks, it is important to recognise that it can also have significant benefits for under-16s. Social media allows young people to maintain friendships, stay connected with family members, and build supportive communities with others who share similar interests or experiences. It has also become a valuable educational tool, with many teenagers using platforms such as YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram to access revision materials, learn new skills, and explore topics that interest them. In addition, social media provides opportunities for creativity and self-expression through photography, writing, art, music, and video creation, helping young people develop digital skills that are increasingly important in education and the workplace. Online communities such as BookTok have even encouraged many teenagers to read more and engage with literature. Furthermore, social media can raise awareness of important social, political, and environmental issues, helping young people become more informed about the world around them. These benefits suggest that while there are legitimate concerns about online safety, the challenge lies in ensuring young people can access the positive aspects of social media while being protected from its potential harms.


Teenagers using smart phones to access social media
Teenagers using smart phones to access social media

On the other side of the coin is the darker, more sinister side of social media. It is important that parents, teachers and carers are aware of these risk and talk to young people about them and the negative affect they can have on children whose brains are still developing and who are not yet fully emotionally mature.

The concern is not necessarily that social media platforms are harmful in themselves, as millions of people use them safely every day. However, critics highlight a number of common risks that can affect younger users in particular. These include exposure to self-harm, suicide-related, violent, or otherwise harmful content, as well as algorithms that can recommend increasingly extreme material based on previous engagement. There are also concerns about the ability for strangers to contact children directly, increasing the risk of grooming or exploitation, alongside issues such as cyberbullying and online harassment. In addition, many platforms are designed to encourage extended use through features that can lead to excessive screen time and potentially addictive behaviour. Other worries include privacy risks linked to data collection, exposure to misinformation and fake news, and the pressure created by social comparison, where young people may feel judged based on likes, followers, and online validation. Together, these concerns form the basis of many arguments in favour of stronger regulation or age restrictions for under-16s.

TikTok has become one of the most popular platforms among young people. However, concerns have been raised about its powerful recommendation algorithm, which can quickly push users towards increasingly similar and sometimes more extreme content. Critics argue that vulnerable users may become trapped in so-called “rabbit holes” of harmful material relating to self-harm, eating disorders, dangerous challenges, or misinformation. In addition, the platform is designed around endless scrolling and short-form videos, which can encourage excessive screen time and make it difficult for users to disengage.

Instagram has faced long-standing criticism over its impact on body image and self-esteem, particularly among teenage girls. The platform’s focus on appearance, edited photographs, influencer culture, and social comparison can create unrealistic expectations about beauty, lifestyle, and success. Instagram was also one of the platforms used by Molly Russell before her death, which brought renewed attention to the type of content being recommended to vulnerable young users.

Snapchat’s disappearing messages and image-sharing features are especially popular with teenagers, but they have also raised safeguarding concerns. Temporary messaging can make it harder to identify cyberbullying or inappropriate communication, while location-sharing features can potentially reveal a user’s whereabouts. The platform also encourages users to maintain “Snapstreaks,” which some critics argue can promote compulsive and habitual use.

Although Facebook is less popular among teenagers than it once was, concerns remain around misinformation, scams, inappropriate content, and the potential for contact from strangers.

X (formerly Twitter) provides access to real-time news and public discussion, but users can also be exposed to abusive language, graphic content, misinformation, and harmful online communities, often with limited barriers to access.

Both Discord and Reddit allow users to join large online communities and interact with strangers. While many groups are positive and educational, concerns remain around exposure to inappropriate content, harmful discussions, and the potential risks of grooming or exploitation. The case of Breck Bednar demonstrated how communication platforms linked to online gaming can be exploited by offenders seeking to build trust with young people over time.

Within this wider debate, it is important to maintain perspective on both sides. Most parents today grew up during a period of rapid technological change themselves, witnessing the transition from house phones attached to walls and dial-up internet to the rise of platforms such as Bebo and MySpace in their own teenage years. With that in mind, it is also important to recognise that the benefits of social media often depend on how it is used rather than simply how much it is used. Research suggests that moderate, purposeful use—such as learning, creating content, maintaining friendships, or participating in positive communities—can be beneficial. Problems are more likely to arise when social media use becomes excessive, replaces real-world activities, exposes young people to harmful content, or negatively affects sleep and mental health.

This is why many experts argue that the debate is far more complicated than it appears on the surface and that it should focus not only on restricting access, but also on teaching young people (and parents) how to use social media safely, responsibly, and in a balanced way.


Boy using a smart phone in school uniform
Boy using a smart phone in school uniform

The multi levelled impacts of social media

As well as the link that excessive social media use has to increase levels of anxiety, depression, sleep disruption, cyberbullying, poor body image, and exposure to harmful content it has also been linked to an increase in poor attention and a decrease in communication and language skills in younger children.

Social media encourages fast, informal communication through abbreviations, emojis, voice notes, memes, and short messages. While these forms of communication can be creative and effective, some educators worry that they reduce opportunities for young people to develop formal writing skills, extended speaking abilities, and sophisticated vocabulary.

Many teachers report that students are finding it more difficult to sustain detailed discussions or produce extended written responses. Some language experts argue that increased screen time may be replacing activities that traditionally support language development, such as reading books and engaging in face-to-face conversations.

The research into social media and reading presents a mixed picture. Some studies suggest that social media can improve digital literacy skills by encouraging young people to navigate, evaluate, and process information online. However, researchers have also found that heavy social media use can be associated with lower enjoyment of reading and reduced engagement with longer texts. The rapid pace of social media content may make it more difficult for some young people to maintain concentration when reading books, articles, or academic materials that require sustained attention.

Teachers and literacy organisations have reported concerns about declining levels of reading for pleasure among children and teenagers. Social media, streaming services, and online gaming compete directly for young people's attention. Reading develops vocabulary, empathy, critical thinking, creativity, and concentration. If social media use replaces reading time, there may be long-term consequences for educational achievement and language development.

However, the relationship is not entirely negative. Communities such as "BookTok" have introduced millions of young people to reading and have helped revive interest in books among teenagers. For many young people, social media can act as a gateway to literature rather than a barrier.

Ultimately, the issue appears to be one of balance rather than complete avoidance.


Pre teens using smart phones together
Pre teens using smart phones together

The Potential Benefits of a Ban

Supporters of restrictions believe there are several potential benefits to limiting or banning social media use for under-16s. One of the main arguments is improved mental health, as reducing access to social media may help protect young people from anxiety, stress, body image concerns, and the pressures created by constant online comparison. Another key benefit is reduced exposure to harmful content, with cases such as Molly Russell highlighting how recommendation algorithms can expose vulnerable users to dangerous material, including content related to self-harm, suicide, eating disorders, and violence. There is also the issue of greater protection from grooming, as demonstrated by the case of Breck Bednar, where online communication was exploited by predators; restricting access may therefore reduce opportunities for online exploitation. In addition, advocates argue that limiting social media use could encourage more time spent on real-world activities such as sports, hobbies, reading, family life, and face-to-face friendships. Improved sleep, concentration, and academic performance are also frequently cited as further potential benefits of reducing screen time among young people.

 

The Challenges and Criticisms

Despite these potential advantages, many people question whether a ban is the right approach. One concern is enforcement. Young people are often highly technologically capable and may find ways around age restrictions through VPNs, alternative accounts, or platforms based overseas.

Others argue that the real problem lies with the design of social media platforms rather than the users themselves. Instead of banning children from accessing social media, they believe governments should force companies to create safer environments. There are also concerns that restrictions could isolate vulnerable young people who rely on online communities for friendship, support, education, or self-expression. Some critics suggest that improving digital literacy and online safety education may be more effective than introducing blanket bans.

As parents to teenagers hearing about this proposal, the feelings in our house are mixed, and if I was a teenager again I think I would probably be having mixed feelings too.

On one hand, my own children can understand why adults are concerned. Stories such as those of Molly Russell and Breck Bednar are heart breaking and demonstrate that online spaces can be dangerous. Most teenagers have encountered cyberbullying, harmful content, scams, or inappropriate messages at some point.

However, social media is also a major part of modern teenage life. It is where friendships are maintained, communities are built, hobbies are shared, and information is exchanged. Many young people use social media to learn new skills, discuss current events, find support networks, and express themselves creatively.

A blanket ban may feel unfair to teenagers who use these platforms responsibly. Many would argue that education, guidance, and stronger platform regulation would be more effective than simply preventing access.

Teenagers often want adults to trust them while helping them navigate risks. If restrictions are introduced without listening to young people's experiences and opinions, they may be viewed as something imposed on teenagers rather than something designed with them in mind.


Teens socialising and using online games
Teens socialising and using online games

So in conclusion, the debate over social media restrictions for under-16s is complex and emotionally charged. Cases such as Molly Russell and Breck Bednar have exposed the very real dangers that can exist online and have strengthened calls for greater protection of children and young people.

There is evidence that excessive social media use can affect mental health, expose users to harmful content, contribute to grooming risks, and influence language development and reading habits. At the same time, social media can provide educational opportunities, social connections, creative outlets, and access to supportive communities.

The challenge facing governments is not simply whether young people should use social media. It is how to create an online environment that allows young people to benefit from amazing positives that technology can offer while minimising the risks and maintaining childhood. Whether through bans, stricter regulation, improved safety measures, or better education, finding the right balance will remain one of the most important digital policy challenges of the coming decade.


Further reading and references:

Comments

bottom of page